Skip to main content

Insight · Structured Data & Entity SEO

Realistically Implementing Website and SearchAction Markup

Since November 21, 2024, Google no longer displays the sitelinks search field. Website markup for site names remains relevant regardless.

For SEO teams and developers, "Website markup without the Google sitelinks search field" can be checked against three specific points: "Currently supported purpose," "Consistent site identity," and "Outdated expectations."

Published: 3 min read · Author:

Google discontinued the Sitelinks search box on November 21, 2024, and no longer requires SearchAction markup for it. A Website with a consistent name, URL, and alternate label can still support Website Identity and Site Name separately.

Consistent Site Identity

  1. Inventory existing Website and Action markup and review each property against its current purpose and actual function.

  2. Remove obsolete SearchAction output and maintain a central Website entity with a stable URL and name.

  3. Check the homepage, Organization relationship, and rendered JSON-LD for consistent site identity.

Implementation Case: "Outdated Expectation"

A website is still using a copied SearchAction template, even though its internal search now works differently. The team removes the outdated action, retains a central WebSite entity for the name and URL, and reviews it together with the publisher on the homepage.

Outdated Expectation

  • Outdated Expectation Teams are waiting for a sitelinks search field that is no longer offered and interpret its absence as a technical error.

  • Fictitious search target – A copied URL template describes an internal search that processes parameters differently or is not publicly accessible at all.

  • Multiple Website Names Templates generate varying names and URLs for the same website, weakening consistent entity representation.

Actual Functionality

  • Number of productive templates that still output SearchAction solely for the configured Google Sitelinks search field or describe a non-functional search target.

  • Consistency of Website Name, Alternative Label, URL, and Publisher Relationship across all relevant outputs.

Currently Supported Purpose

  • Currently Supported Purpose Each property has a current, functional, or documented search function and is not simply carried over from an old example.

  • Consistent Site Identity – Name, alternative name, URL, and organization relationship match the homepage and public brand.

  • Actual Functionality – Actions are only modeled if the described entry point actually works and is accessible to users.

What distinguishes “Website Markup without a Google Sitelinks Search Field” Maintain organization markup completely with real company data an important follow-up question: What real company data belongs in well-maintained organization markup?

For those who want to delve deeper into "Website Markup without the Google Sitelinks Search Field" from the perspective of the "Local SEO & Entity Management" cluster, see Using Schema.org cleanly and completely for LocalBusiness .

If you want to practically implement "Website Markup without the Google Sitelinks Search Field," you can refer to Robust Website Systems This document focuses on "Visibility and Current Feature Suitability" and "Currently Supported Purpose."

Markup should describe current features and real-world capabilities. The removal of the Google Sitelinks Search Field doesn't render the website meaningless, but it clearly separates the site's identity from the no-longer-supported SearchAction output.

Sources and Further Information

These primary sources are authoritative for platform behavior, terminology, and validation limits for "website markup without the Google sitelinks search box."

Key Thesis

Google has not displayed the Sitelinks search field since November 21, 2024, and no longer supports SearchAction markup for it. WebSite markup remains usable separately for site names.

What This Is Not About

SearchAction is not generally obsolete; however, the markup should not be maintained out of habit for the discontinued Google Sitelinks search field, nor without a genuine, relevant website search.

What it's about

WebSite markup describes the website and its preferred name; only search action outputs generated for the former Google Sitelinks search field or those that are no longer functional are being removed independently.

More insights

Structured data & entity SEO

Don't confuse product and service markup

For “Website Markup without Google Sitelinks search field”, the question “When is product markup correct and when must a product be modeled as a service?” is a separate test step.

Structured data & entity SEO

Maintain person entities for authors and contacts in a credible manner

Adds a separate decision to "Website Markup without Google Sitelinks Search Field": How do you credibly maintain person entities for authors and contacts?

Insights Overview

All VELUNO Insights at a Glance

Further analyses on Website Systems, digital visibility, and robust working models.

Practical Implications

Real-world function specification: next cross-check

In the current JSON-LD, all actions and their actual target flow should be checked. For the website, a few stable identity details from a central source are then sufficient.